Latest from the blog

Featured Image
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Awolowo v Awolowo and Linkserve [2025] EWCA Civ 641 is a masterclass in forensic scrutiny of alleged debts in financial remedy proceedings. It also serves as a reminder …
May 19, 2025
Featured Image
If you're separating from your spouse and struggling financially, you may have heard about something called Maintenance Pending Suit or MPS. But what is it, and when is it actually worth applying for? What …
May 16, 2025
Featured Image
For family lawyers advising high-net-worth clients, the concept of “top-up” child maintenance is often one of the most contested elements in financial proceedings. The decision in James v Seymour [2023] EWHC 844 (Fam) adds …
May 15, 2025
Featured Image
In THR v WAT [2025] EWHC 1125 (Fam), His Honour Judge Hess was faced with the unenviable task of transforming a multi-million-pound Xydhias agreement into a final financial remedy order—navigating disputed terms, hidden costs, …
May 14, 2025
Featured Image
The decision in GH v IH [2025] EWFC 120 (B) provides a revealing look at the long tail of family financial orders, where joint lives maintenance collides with real-life messiness: patchy compliance, unclear enforcement, …
May 13, 2025
Featured Image
How do you divide a £263 million fortune when over £200 million of it is tied up in private companies? In BR v BR [2025] EWFC 88, Mr Justice Peel was faced with exactly …
May 12, 2025
Featured Image
In DSD v MJW [2025] EWFC 119 (B), Deputy District Judge David Hodson delivers a candid—and cutting—judgment on a £500-a-month maintenance pending suit (MPS) application that cost nearly £13,000 in legal fees to argue. …
May 9, 2025
Featured Image
In the financial remedy case of AB v CD & Ors [2025] EWFC 958, His Honour Judge Richard Williams provides a detailed, forensic examination of when and how a financial remedy applicant can succeed …
April 28, 2025
Featured Image
In VTY v GDB [2025] EWFC 110 (B), Recorder Rhys Taylor faced one of the more unusual and unsettling examples of non-disclosure in recent family law decisions. At the heart of the case was …
April 25, 2025
Featured Image
In family law, few allegations carry more weight than material non-disclosure. When a party believes they were misled during financial remedy proceedings, the remedy they seek is serious: setting aside a final order. But …
April 22, 2025
Featured Image
Family law is no stranger to long-running, emotionally charged disputes. But what happens when one party simply refuses to stop litigating—even after years of judgments, failed appeals, and repeated rejections? That is where the …
April 17, 2025
Featured Image
In the emotionally charged world of family litigation, personal boundaries can easily become collateral damage. But what happens when a party wants to shield their contact details from the other side? The recent decision …
April 16, 2025
Featured Image
A decision from the Court of Appeal in Ahmad and IIB Group Holdings v Faraj [2025] EWCA Civ 468 has caused a stir among family law practitioners. In an unusual but not unprecedented move, …
April 16, 2025
Featured Image
In the emotionally charged landscape of divorce litigation, reaching an agreement on finances can feel like the light at the end of the tunnel. But what happens when one party tries to walk away …
April 15, 2025
Featured Image
In X v Y [2025] EWHC 727 (Fam), the Family Division of the High Court was asked to revisit a financial remedy order after a final judgment—but before the order was perfected—because of a …
April 14, 2025
Featured Image
It’s a scenario that comes up time and again in divorce: you’re worried your spouse isn’t being honest about money. You come across some of their bank statements or business records — maybe they …
April 8, 2025
Featured Image
“We were basically married already.” It’s something family lawyers hear a lot when a client describes their long-term relationship — only some years later comes the wedding, often followed (sadly) by separation. But legally, …
April 7, 2025
Featured Image
Since 29 April 2024, family lawyers have had a new set of procedural rules to reckon with—changes that bring mediation and other non-court dispute resolution (NCDR) methods right into the spotlight. These aren’t just …
April 4, 2025
Featured Image
The recent judgment in TA v SB [2025] EWFC 61 (B) offers a compelling look at how family courts balance financial settlements in cases where one spouse has significant mental health challenges. The case …
March 24, 2025
Featured Image
Mahtani v Mahtani [2025] EWFC 35 (Fam) is a stark reminder of the serious consequences of non-attendance and non-disclosure in financial remedy proceedings. This case serves as yet another warning that attempting to evade …
March 19, 2025
Featured Image
At first glance, DF v YB [2025] EWFC 46 (B) appears to be a straightforward financial remedy case—a 19-year marriage, an agreed equal division of assets, and no significant conduct arguments. But beneath the …
March 13, 2025
york-skyline-color
york-skyline-color
york-skyline-color

Get in touch for your free consultation

James-Thornton-Family-Law_white

Where innovation meets excellence

Our mission is clear: to redefine the standards of legal representation by seamlessly integrating unparalleled expertise with cutting-edge innovation.

01904 373 111
info@jamesthorntonfamilylaw.co.uk

York Office

Popeshead Court Offices, Peter Lane, York, YO1 8SU

Appointment only

James Thornton Family Law Limited (trading as James Thornton Family Law) is a Company, registered in England and Wales, with Company Number 15610140. Our Registered Office is Popeshead Court Offices, Peter Lane, York, YO1 8SU. Director: James Thornton. We are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA number 8007901, and subject to the SRA Standards and Regulations which can be accessed at www.sra.org.uk

Privacy Notice  |  Complaints  |  Terms of Business

Facebook
X (Twitter)
Instagram

©2024 James Thornton Family Law Limited