Latest from the blog

Featured Image
The case of G v N [2025] EWFC 286 (B) is a striking reminder of how the family courts approach the matrimonial home when it is the sole remaining asset – and how long …
September 12, 2025
Featured Image
The recent case of AA v BA [2025] EWFC 278 (B) shines a spotlight on one of the trickier corners of financial remedy litigation: what happens when third parties—often parents—claim an interest in matrimonial …
September 4, 2025
Featured Image
In family finance cases, the golden rule is simple: disclose everything. The courts cannot divide what they cannot see. Yet the recent sequel judgment in TYB v CAR (Non-Disclosure) (No 2) [2025] EWFC 263 …
August 22, 2025
Featured Image
The recent decision in IN v CH [2025] EWFC 265 offers a textbook example of how the family courts tackle attempts to sidestep financial claims in divorce through asset dispositions. The case concerned the …
August 21, 2025
Featured Image
In the fast-paced, paper-heavy world of family law litigation, deadlines are more than administrative niceties — they are the procedural backbone of fairness. The recent case of AB v CD [2025] EWFC 253 (B) …
August 8, 2025
Featured Image
In Michael v Michael (No 3) [2025] EWFC 245, His Honour Judge Hess dealt with the tangled web of asset valuation, liquidity, tax exposure, and non-matrimonial property in a case where the wife emerged …
August 7, 2025
Featured Image
In JB v RB [2025] EWFC 194 (B), Recorder Allen KC was asked to answer a deceptively tricky question: when is a loan not a loan? The case delves into the increasingly common issue …
August 4, 2025
Featured Image
Is an FDR hearing truly sacrosanct? That’s the core question raised in BC v BC [2025] EWFC 236, a case that challenges the traditional shield of confidentiality that surrounds Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) hearings. …
August 1, 2025
Featured Image
In the world of family law financial remedies, expert evidence can make or break a case. But who gets to call the expert—and what happens when one party disagrees with the conclusions? The recent …
July 25, 2025
Featured Image
Conduct arguments in financial remedy cases are famously hard to win. The bar is high, the principles are narrow, and the courts are cautious. But two recent decisions—MRU v ECR [2025] EWFC 218 (B) …
July 22, 2025
Featured Image
In PZ v ZD [2025] EWFC 171 (B), Deputy District Judge Gwynfor Evans faced a case that was modest in financial scale but immense in evidential and procedural complexity. It illustrates how procedural diligence …
July 16, 2025
Featured Image
In AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B), His Honour Judge Farquhar delivered a pointed and practical judgment showing that while final orders are meant to be just that—final—there are limits to judicial patience, …
July 15, 2025
Featured Image
In PN v SA [2025] EWFC 141, the Family Court delivered a landmark judgment in what is believed to be the third-largest financial remedy case in English legal history. Behind the billion-pound headlines lies …
July 14, 2025
Featured Image
In BM v MB & Ors [2025] EWFC 129, Fiona Hay (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) presided over a case that had it all: dynastic business assets, disputed share transfers, intergenerational family …
June 30, 2025
Featured Image
When is a bad application so hopeless that it can be struck out without a full hearing? That question lies at the heart of M v B [2025] EWFC 182, a case that dives …
June 27, 2025
Featured Image
When we think of asset dissipation and the “add-back” principle, we often picture yachts, casinos, or private jets. But in MNV v CNV [2025] EWFC 176 (B), Deputy District Judge Bradshaw dealt with these …
June 23, 2025
Featured Image
In DH v RH [2025] EWFC 175, Mr Justice MacDonald delivered a powerful message to recalcitrant litigants in financial remedy cases: refusal to cooperate doesn’t stop the court—it just means the court steps in …
June 20, 2025
Featured Image
In Ozturk v Ozturk [2025] EWFC 162 (B), Her Honour Judge Moreton handed down a judgment that should ring loud alarm bells for any party tempted to ignore court orders in divorce proceedings. This …
June 18, 2025
Featured Image
In CA v UK [2025] EWFC 117 (B), His Honour Judge Watkins delivered a sharp, thoughtful decision on an increasingly familiar scenario: how and where to resolve international child maintenance disputes when parents, assets, …
June 16, 2025
Featured Image
In OS v DT [2025] EWFC 156 (B), His Honour Judge Edward Hess presided over a high-net-worth financial remedy dispute that, beneath its glittering spreadsheets and asset schedules, boiled down to something less glamorous—but …
June 13, 2025
Featured Image
In C v C [2025] EWFC 152 (B), Recorder Christopher Stirling tackled a complex and increasingly common issue in modern financial remedy proceedings: what happens when a party borrows against non-matrimonial property for matrimonial …
June 12, 2025
york-skyline-color
york-skyline-color
york-skyline-color

Get in touch for your free consultation

James-Thornton-Family-Law_white

Where innovation meets excellence

Our mission is clear: to redefine the standards of legal representation by seamlessly integrating unparalleled expertise with cutting-edge innovation.

01904 373 111
info@jamesthorntonfamilylaw.co.uk

York Office

Popeshead Court Offices, Peter Lane, York, YO1 8SU

Appointment only

James Thornton Family Law Limited (trading as James Thornton Family Law) is a Company, registered in England and Wales, with Company Number 15610140. Our Registered Office is Popeshead Court Offices, Peter Lane, York, YO1 8SU. Director: James Thornton. We are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA number 8007901, and subject to the SRA Standards and Regulations which can be accessed at www.sra.org.uk

Privacy Notice  |  Complaints  |  Terms of Business

Facebook
X (Twitter)
Instagram

©2024 James Thornton Family Law Limited